bourne identity

[sparksy]

old one .. but i havent seen any of them so i thought id start at the beginning....... pretty good film i thought, looked a bit dated now... but pretty good

[skeletor]

Made a good change from the newer Bond Films IMO.

[BlacKBlazE]

I've liked all the bourne films

[liquid]

Yeah all of em are great.

[Revolver]

Agreed.
Three fantastic films. Really enjoyable and like Skele said, at the time of the first one it really made a change to the Bond crap. If Martin Campbell (I did have to look that up) and company claim that the new Bond films weren't unfluenced by The Bourne films then they are lying...

http://www.play.com/DVD/DVD/4-/3513101/ ... oduct.html

I actually only ordered this yesterday on the play.com deal of the day for £6.

[sparksy]

pretty cheap..... ill look at the other two films for sure now.... pisses on daniel craig bond crap..... tbh i think all james bond films are crap really..apart from some early sean connery ones.....

[BlacKBlazE]

I prefer austin powers films to james bond never been able to get into them

[skeletor]

I agree with Sparkes, the old James Bonds were good but they have gone downhill as time as gone on.

John Cleese will never be the same as Desmond Llewelyn as Q.

[liquid]

All true. But I have to say, I did like Casino Royale tbh.

[Revolver]

All true. But I have to say, I did like Casino Royale tbh.

Agreed, Quantum of Solace was a bit poop but Casino Royale was good. Same point as before though, Casino Royale wasn't James Bond. Few gadgets and less 1 vs a million stuff and a more "Bourne" type fighting and intelligence.

So Casino Royale was good because it wasn't a normal Bond film, work that out...

The latter Pierce Brosnan one's were pretty poor I thought.