http://www.cclonline.com/product-info-pc.asp?id=13700
2ms response time. wasted on an old fart like me though. my response time is 5 minutes.
£240.85 delivered
Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
Re: Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
I haven't got you in to buying a new monitor have I? I don't want to get killed by your missus.
Cheapest I have seen was Play, but waiting is supposed to be around 2 months.
Overclockers are around £275 delivered, but most of the screens sold are the S panel.
Cheapest I have seen was Play, but waiting is supposed to be around 2 months.
Overclockers are around £275 delivered, but most of the screens sold are the S panel.
Re: Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
bugger me. i have beat it. £209.00 delivered and in stock... any advance!!
Re: Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
Wow, where the hell is that? Is that an S Panel?
Re: Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
it doesnt say but reading up on it, they are shipping with no stickers now but the general concensus is they are the worst C versions. Its pc world 224.00 collect in store an see what you are getting, or 209.00 russian roulette ....
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/product/seo/968070
You need to use something called quidco to get the discount down to 209.00 but thats only for delivered on-line monitors
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/product/seo/968070
You need to use something called quidco to get the discount down to 209.00 but thats only for delivered on-line monitors
Re: Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
I though the C's were better than the A's weren't they?
Well Samsung promised to stop shipping A's and C's and would only ship S panels from now on.
Well Samsung promised to stop shipping A's and C's and would only ship S panels from now on.
Re: Samsung SM226BW - best price challenge...
I may make a trip to PC World to see it in action. See what the quality is like and have a looksy to see what panel it is using.
Although I have read some 226BW's were mislabeled.
Although I have read some 226BW's were mislabeled.