Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Post by **Revolver** » Fri 22 Jan 2010 1:20 pm

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... -away.html
So there seems to be something seriously wrong with these kids, they really ought to lock people like this up and have some proper treatment for when they grow up. Just lash them and torture them for 10 years I'm sure they will come out a better person. If not, they at least got what they deserve.

But what's missing in the article? I'll give you a clue, it's not even in this one either.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... years.html

Post by **skeletor** » Fri 22 Jan 2010 2:07 pm

They shouldn't be locked up, there is no point. Waste of money paying for their board for 5 years.

Just kill the cunts. They won't change in 5 years, they are fucked in the head. Lethal injection, everyone gets on with their lives.

Post by **sparksy** » Sat 23 Jan 2010 1:44 pm

they were locked up... they were in care...the council let em roam about were they wanted... to be nasty little cunts... fucking usless half witts

maybe lock them back up again.... in a small box preferabley... rest it on the edge of a cliff..and leave it there until someone pushes them off..

or just gas them.. and sterilise the parents so they cant have any more

am i getting to carryed away here ?

Post by **Revolver** » Mon 25 Jan 2010 5:39 pm

sparksy wrote:they were locked up... they were in care...the council let em roam about were they wanted... to be nasty little cunts... fucking usless half witts

maybe lock them back up again.... in a small box preferabley... rest it on the edge of a cliff..and leave it there until someone pushes them off..

or just gas them.. and sterilise the parents so they cant have any more am i getting to carryed away here ?

No you're not getting carried away. Like Skel said they won't change so just sort the fuckers out, tis country is too soft.

Anyway the thing I was getting at was that there was no mention of "violent videogames" or "they played Grand Theft Auto extensively and learnt to shoot playing the game Counter-Strike".

Which I found unbelievable, especially from the daily mail....

Post by **BlacKBlazE** » Mon 25 Jan 2010 6:02 pm

Revolver wrote:
sparksy wrote:they were locked up... they were in care...the council let em roam about were they wanted... to be nasty little cunts... fucking usless half witts

maybe lock them back up again.... in a small box preferabley... rest it on the edge of a cliff..and leave it there until someone pushes them off..

or just gas them.. and sterilise the parents so they cant have any more am i getting to carryed away here ?
No you're not getting carried away. Like Skel said they won't change so just sort the fuckers out, tis country is too soft.

Anyway the thing I was getting at was that there was no mention of "violent videogames" or "they played Grand Theft Auto extensively and learnt to shoot playing the game Counter-Strike".

Which I found unbelievable, especially from the daily mail....

They watched child's play

Post by **Revolver** » Tue 26 Jan 2010 8:18 am

BlacKBlazE wrote:They watched child's play

Thanks Blaze, I hadn't read the whole article

Post by **sparksy** » Thu 28 Jan 2010 8:08 pm

They watched child's play

thats the same lame excuse that jamie bulgers killers made years ago...we watched childs play

not long after a big debate was held about video nastys

Ambassadors of Pain

Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Re: Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Re: Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Re: Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Re: Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Re: Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?

Re: Now thats incredibly disturbing, but what is missing?